Americans yes or no.
Well, the political left in this country can't stop themselves from putting everyone in some group or another. The groups of preference seem to be either monetary or racial. Worst of all people at NPR (this would be Welfare recipients (see I can do it to)), seem to want to do this with tax payers money. Why must they always analyze by group, can't these people just see Americans with differing opinions and address their concerns. No one I know hates President Obama because he is "black" or "African American", many don't hate him at all (like myself) but disagree with what he is trying to do to this country.
The Left Media's real problem is they can't understand why Americans (interesting name to call them don't you think) with lower to moderate income don't want to take money from their more well to do neighbors. Just a hint to the folks at NPR, ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN and all you other fools out there, its probably for the same reason they don't break into the homes of their wealthier neighbors and steal their flat screen tv, its immoral and its wrong. Rich by itself means nothing if someone acquired their wealth through moral means and hard work most "Americans" (there's that word again) think thats great even those "Americans" who don't make as much.
In an NPR interview a libtard also said this:
Mr. KAI WRIGHT (Senior Writer, The Root): We’re seeing the manifestations of an anxiety amongst poor and working class white folks about what is my place in a vastly changing culture and a vastly changing economy. Those are real and meaningful anxieties, and we’re seeing a group of folks trying to exploit those anxieties.
So if you think I am just imagining things only libtards can think for themselves, people like Ms. Sheehan weren't manipulated by the left, but regular "Americans" when they get involved an offer their opinions they are being manipulated. I guess we should break windows and destroy property like the left, maybe then they would consider our opinions as legitimate.
On Second thought I do hate you libtards for your condescending attitudes and your kool-aid drinking unthinking follow the herd opinions.
Comments
Greetings,
I think this is a great topic. I've seen many Republicans kind of assume they know what liberals want. I'm pro-military, pro-authority and I've called the authorities over a dozen times on our law-breaking neighbros.
I don't quite get how you can use the word "lib-tards" though, and in the same sentence call us "condescending". It seems a bit contradictory, no?
By the way I was going to address you as "Major", however I am ignorant as to how to address someone in the Military, Navy, Marines etc if I am unsure of their rank.....
I wasn't aware of Pelosi using name-calling, I would think that is disgraceful. Do you have a video that shows what she called people?
Actually I do understand the rank, I have simply never heard confirmation that "Major" was correct to use if someone had not officially announced their rank. I have several members of my family in the miltary (Army and Air Force) so I do understand the official system.
That's a great point about the progressives and conservatives - I actually consider myself a total conservative - sadly the original stance of conservatives was being proper, being a gentleman, but that has all gone out the window with the poncy screaming about Nazis and such.
Trust me, if Obama was a Nazi, most of us would be sitting in ovens by now. But you seem like a reasonable guy, a true gentleman so that gives me hope. We do need to unify ourselves so as not to get railroaded by our government!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGRUx2b0ArM&feature=related
There is the video.
As for calling Obama a Nazi, if I did that is incorrect. However, if we trace back the roots of liberal/progressive movement in America it is of the same tree that facism comes from, the idea that facism is right wing was introduced by Stalin. Interesting enough that the word facism has no specific meaning to most but is simply a way to describe people with whom one disagrees, so I guess Stalin won that one for most.
Facism does have a specific meaning though and it has nothing to do with the mass execution of the Jews or racism as it is often stated. Its a form of government that is socialist in nature and nationalist in scope, where as communism is more international in scope and tends to eliminate privately held property. If you would like to see more information on the history of facism and its ties to the liberal/progressive movement in the US, I would recommend Jonah Goldberg's book. "Liberal Facism". Just as a side note the Nazi's although facist where also racist in that they believed in a racially pure society, the Spanish and Italians where also facist and did not believe this, as a matter of fact Franco eliminated the 1492 edict that was issued to force Jews out of Spain.
If fascism comes to America it will come with a smiley face, but forcing others to do things for their own good was a very "Nazi" thing to do.